Over the past two decades, engineers and scientists have been exploring the applications of lead acid batteries in emerging devices such as hybrid electric vehicles and renewable energy storage; these applications necessitate operation under partial state of charge.
In addition, retired vehicle power batteries can serve as a viable alternative to lead-acid batteries for energy storage systems, thereby mitigating the resource and environmental challenges associated with new LAB production.
This study aims to establish a life cycle evaluation model of retired EV lithium-ion batteries and new lead-acid batteries applied in the energy storage system, compare their environmental impacts, and provide data reference for the secondary utilization of lithium-ion batteries and the development prospect of energy storage batteries.
Implementation of battery man-agement systems, a key component of every LIB system, could improve lead–acid battery operation, efficiency, and cycle life. Perhaps the best prospect for the unuti-lized potential of lead–acid batteries is elec-tric grid storage, for which the future market is estimated to be on the order of trillions of dollars.
The results indicate that the production phase of NCM batteries has the most significant resource and environmental impacts, whereas the production phase of lead-acid batteries has the least impacts. Overall, the production process of lithium-ion batteries poses more resource and environmental challenges than lead-acid batteries.
It has been the most successful commercialized aqueous electrochemical energy storage system ever since. In addition, this type of battery has witnessed the emergence and development of modern electricity-powered society. Nevertheless, lead acid batteries have technologically evolved since their invention.